By Contributing Editor Christian Fong
Yesterday, in Part 1, I wrote that to our personal peril and our collective destruction, we don't know what we don't know. As a result, we each should be willing to disrupt our own ideas to find those unknowns.
Able to adapt, and in doing so, to avoid becoming dinosaurs – lumbering around with old ideas, inferior methods, obsolete thinking or robotic reactions lacking imagination. Those who adopt the discipline of thinking that examines old ideas, disrupting and improving them in order to move forward are called Progressives.
Progressive. A label for Conservatives to wear with pride. It was an odd exchange. There is no logic to considering Progressive and Republican as being on opposite sides of the spectrum. Or to think Moderate and Progressive are mutually exclusive. But a hundred years of brand management from the left has made it seem so.
By now, pundits routinely, and mistakenly, interchange "liberal" for "progressive." Liberals have done a wonderful job not just labeling Conservatives as knee-jerk reactionaries, but of taking some of the best terms for themselves!
(An aside on labeling those who disagree with us. My 6 year old might call someone "a stinky", and be reminded that he needs to show some maturity by his teacher. An adult labeling an opponent as "extremist" deserves the same reaction. Childish attacks should have no place in the civic discourse. Yet if you are the recipient of such an attack, you should consider yourself blessed, since it usually means your opponent can find no flaw in your logic and has retreated to juvenilities. Or that we’ve allowed the political process to lower itself to the level of a playground insult war).
But it is one thing to label someone negatively, and another to wisely manage one’s own reputation. It is a good thing to be described as "open-minded" or "progressive." It will be good when pundits start attaching those words to Conservatives. And, best yet, when careful brand management is backed up with reality.
To get there, Conservatives have to be willing to identify which of our old ideas are inadequate for the needs of today, and publicly say, "This is who we were. It wasn’t good enough. We’re moving forward." We have to offer our solutions, because we have tested them and found them to be relevant ideas for today’s problems. So what is a Progressive Conservative?
But stop for a moment and think of a time when massive government intervention has made, or can make, the world better.
Are you a principled "Strong America," military supporter? Fantastic, I’m with you. But ask yourself if physical might, in the absence of spiritual and cultural authority, is a good thing. (Try the Roman Empire for a start.)
Are you anti-IRS? Well, who isn’t? But ask yourself what America would be like if taxes were optional, or if there were none. Or why Lincoln was willing to stake the existence of a country fighting the poisonous idea that supporting the federal government was optional. In that fight, it was Lincoln himself that started the income tax and the IRS (history here). Wrestle with the tension of why that matters.
Disrupt your ideas and, like light to a prism, your perspective fractures, leading to the discovery that the difference between black and white is never the end of the analysis. Doing so will make you a stronger thinker. A more grounded, smarter Conservative. And a bit less of a sucker.
What’s your disruptive idea? Twitter me (or follow my tweets) here.
Part 3: I am, proudly, a Progressive Conservative. What does that mean to Iowa?

You're right about this. That's why tax cuts are the answer to every ill ever conceived. Always has been. Surpluses? Tax cuts needed. Deficits? Tax cuts needed. Progressive means never having to rethink your answer to any problem.
Gay marriage is bad because *you* have the right (via consitutational amendment!) to tell someone else who they can and cannot marry because of your progressive beliefs.
Spending is bad! Except when Bush did it, enacting at the time massive medicare spending, war spending. There were no tea parties then.
In the end, you're absolutely right: conservatives do need to be more progressive. And that means rethinking old ideas that failed. I'm watching for that change with anticipation. So far, I've seen little change from anyone in the conservative movement, aside from noticing there's a "D" after the name of the current president.
What changes does the party need to make? I don't see any specifics here about what the party needs to change.
Posted by: smurfyhoser | April 21, 2009 at 01:12 PM
Christian, I couldn't disagree with you more. I think by making all the compromises we have is why we now lose elections. i think there are now 3 distinct types of republicans. the paleo-conservative (Pat Buchanan,ron Paul types),the religous right (huckabee types) and the moderate-liberal republicans (McCain types). a candidate needs to appeal to 2 of these 3 groups to win. were not likely to find another Reagan who appealed to all 3 groups. but we cant just abandon our principals in order to get along with everyone.
Posted by: anonomous guy | April 21, 2009 at 02:27 PM
Good Day. Money frees you from doing things you dislike. Since I dislike doing nearly everything, money is handy. Help me! Please help find sites for: Dow jones stock market. I found only this - stock market history graph. Fed leaves rates unchanged, says economy is leveling out mins ago. For first time bloggers, a free blogging website is a nifty way to get started in the blogosphere. Waiting for a reply :eek:, Lucius from Congo.
Posted by: Lucius | August 14, 2009 at 12:02 AM